New | used car reviews, prices, pictures, specs, and buying tips.
New | used car research, prices, specs, pictures US car and auto show news New | used car price, auto purchase, insurance new car / auto price comparison Car | Auto forum Buy | sell new | used car | auto information
Home > Research > Chevrolet > Chevrolet Uplander > 2006 Chevrolet Uplander
2006 Chevrolet Uplander Review | Specs | Prices | Pictures | Forum | Wallpapers
Summary
Specs
Features & Prices
Pictures & Wallpapers
Safety
Reliability
buy a new Uplander
Get your price
Price with options
Comparison
related categories
Forum
Directory
comparable cars
(?)
Dodge Caravan
Ford Freestar
Honda Odyssey
Mazda MPV
Nissan Quest
Toyota Sienna
Standard Safety Features

- 4-wheel anti-lock brakes (ABS)
- Child safety rear door locks
- Electronic stability program (Cargo)
- Front height-adjustable head restraints
- Front height-adjustable seatbelts
- Front seatbelt pretensioners
- Front seat dual-stage airbags with occupancy sensors
- Rear fixed head restraints
- Side impact bars
- Traction control (Cargo)

NHTSA Crash Test
Frontal Impact
Driver's side: Five Star Rating
Passenger's side: Five Star Rating
Side Impact
Front seat: Four Star Rating
Rear seat: Five Star Rating
Chance of rollover in single vehicle crash Three Star Rating
IIHS Frontal Offset Crash Test
Overall Evaluation: Good
Structure / Safety Cage: Good
Injury Measures:
High head accelerations occurred when the dummy's head hit both the steering wheel through the airbag and the B-pillar, indicating that head injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity. Injury measures taken from the neck, chest, and both legs indicate low risk of injuries to these body regions.
 
Head / Neck: Acceptable
Chest: Good
Leg / Foot (left): Good
Leg / Foot (right): Good
Restraints / Dummy Kinematics: Acceptable
Dummy movement was reasonably well controlled. However, the dummy's head bottomed out the airbag and hit the steering wheel. During rebound, the dummy's head hit the B-pillar and roof rail.
 
Legend:
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Poor
IIHS Side Impact Crash Test

Beginning with 2006 models, the side airbags became optional for both the front and second row seating positions (front only in 2005). Also beginning with 2006 models manufactured after November 2005, the vehicle floor was reinforced to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes (note: information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door). Further changes were made starting with 2006 models manufactured after February 2006 to strengthen the standard second row bucket seats for side impact crashes. (The optional captain's chairs were modified earlier.)

Two tests of the Uplander were conducted, one with optional side airbags for the driver and rear passenger, and one without. Both vehicles were manufactured after all design changes for 2006 had been made. These vehicles are rated separately, except that the structural ratings for both vehicles are based on both tests. In both tests, there were problems with the seats occupied by the rear passenger dummies. During the first test, all four of the attachment points for the optional captain's chair (with side airbag) released, allowing the seat to become completely dislodged. In the second test with the standard bucket seat (and no side airbag), one attachment point released and a second one broke, allowing partial separation of the seat from the floor. While these seat separations did not appear to exacerbate any injury measures recorded by the rear dummies, such separations should not occur.

Please note that roadtests.com provides the test of the model equipped WITH the optional side-impact airbags only. In the test without these airbags, the Uplander fared much worse, earning an overall "Poor" evaluation due to a "Marginal" head-injury rating on both sides and high torso injury measures on the driver's side. Roadtests.com would thus like to encourage buyers to specify the optional side-impact airbags upon purchase.
 

Overall Evaluation: Marginal
Structure / Safety Cage: Poor
Driver Injury Measures:
Measures taken from the dummy indicate that serious neck injuries would be possible in a crash of this severity. The risk of significant injuries to other body regions is low.
 
Head / Neck: Marginal
Torso: Good
Pelvis / Leg: Good
Rear Passenger Injury Measures:
Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.
 
Head / Neck: Good
Torso: Good
Pelvis / Leg: Good
Head Protection:

Driver: The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side airbag that deployed from the seat.

Rear passenger: The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side airbag that deployed from the seat.
 

Driver: Good
Rear Passenger: Good
Legend:
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Poor
Discuss in Forum | Specs | Features | Pictures | Reliability
select another model
Copyright © 2002 - 2012 roadtests.com